On
one hand, there was the player who was leading while entering the
final round, and it was his tourney to lose. A little further down
the pack was the closest challenger who differentiated himself by an
obvious trait and methodology.
What
was the distinguishing factor?
The
ability to make and commit to a decision.
The
buzz on many sports channels leading up to the final round was the
almost mockery of the leader's inability to “pull the trigger.”
His approach and subsequent hesitation to commit to his swing was
near comical. He was plagued with indecision. He had incessant starts
and stops.
His
ultimate challenger was just the opposite, even though he had to make
up a few shots to gain the lead. You could immediately see the
contrast. His approach and routine was more like a repeatable
template.
His
formula could be described using a familiar model (ZDT):
Step
One: Assessed the situation and the shot needed
Step
Two: Chose the club and committed to the shot
Step
Three: Executed the swing and shot without hesitation
Step
Four: Positioned the ball to get it in the hole with the fewest shots
And
notably, this exercise was done in less than a minute. The major
point was that the routine was repeatable, predictable and in this
case, produced a winning result.
The
leader became the loser, and the challenger became the winner. Chalk
another decisioning result up to a repeatable model.
As
always...you decide.
No comments:
Post a Comment